MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association Between Migraine, Migraine Subtype, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4409965287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Steen Hansen, Cecilie Holm Christiansen, Ane Lilleøre Rom, Nina Olsén Nathan, Marie Stampe Emborg, Line Rode, Hanne Kristine Hegaard

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioRetrospective cohort studyObstetricsPregnancyMigraineCohortCohort studySmall for gestational ageGestational ageMeta-analysisPlacental abruptionMigraine with auraPreeclampsiaConfidence intervalPediatricsInternal medicineAuraGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Migraine is one of the most prevalent conditions worldwide. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association between migraine, its subtypes, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Material and Methods Eligible cohort and retrospective case–control studies were included from PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to May 2024. Adverse pregnancy outcomes of interest were preeclampsia, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age, and placental abruption. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Meta‐analyses of the outcomes with their odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aOR), including a 95% confidence interval (CI), were performed using RevMan. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models, with separate analyses for cohort and retrospective case–control studies. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42023404759). Results This meta‐analysis included 19 studies (11 cohort and 8 retrospective case–control) encompassing 1 420 690 deliveries. Significant associations were observed between migraine and increased risk of preeclampsia (cohort: aOR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.11–1.47], I 2 = 0%), (retrospective case–control: aOR 3.4 [95% CI: 1.81–6.4], I 2 = 83%) and preterm birth (cohort: aOR 1.30 [95% CI: 1.17–1.44], I 2 = 11%). The meta‐analyses of adjusted data on low birthweight and small for gestational age were inconsistent with respect to statistical significance (cohort: aOR 1.27 [95% CI: 0.89–1.82], I 2 = 36% and cohort: aOR 1.07 [95% CI: 1.03–1.12], I 2 = 0%, respectively). In addition, migraine without aura (MO) (cohort: OR 1.62 [95% CI: 1.30–2.01], I 2 = 0%; retrospective case–control: aOR 4.91 [95% CI: 2.78–8.67], I 2 = 0%) and migraine with aura (MA) (cohort: OR 2.06 [95% CI: 1–4.27], I 2 = 29%) were significantly associated with the risk of preeclampsia. Similarly, MO (cohort: OR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.11–1.49], I 2 = 0%) and MA (cohort: OR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.07–1.47], I 2 = 0%) were associated with preterm birth risk. Conclusions Pregnant women with migraines have a higher risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth compared with those without migraines. Migraine could be associated with an increased risk of low birth weight and small for gestational age. Sub‐analyses indicate an elevated risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth across migraine subtypes. Notably, no previous meta‐analyses have differentiated between migraine subtypes. Additional studies are needed to strengthen these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.035
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207