MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409972586 · doi:10.18280/ts.420241

Enhanced Meta-Heuristic Approach for Echo Suppression in Synthetic Aperture Radar Using Non-Periodic Interrupted Sampling

2025· article· en· W4409972586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anoosha Chukka

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcho (communications protocol)HeuristicSynthetic aperture radarSampling (signal processing)Computer scienceRadarAlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceComputer networkDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echo cancellation is a deception jamming technique designed to nullify the target's echo and prevent its detection by enemy radar.Traditional methods rely on time-domain synchronization, but they struggle to fully suppress echoes when there is an amplitude mismatch.This limitation often leaves the target partially visible in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, reducing the effectiveness of the jamming technique.Non-periodic interrupted sampling modulation (NP-ISM) is applied as it produces a continuous jamming strip instead of discrete false targets whereas in Periodic sampling multiple false targets emerge even the real target echo is canceled which makes it easy to be countered by enemy radar.The improved henry gas solubility optimization algorithm (IHGSOA) is applied in the echo cancellation model to optimize the random rectangular envelope pulse train in the NP-ISM which enhances signal cancellation.This significantly reduces the Peak to Average Ratio (PAR), enabling more effective target echo suppression.A polynomial non-linear frequency modulation (PNLFM) is employed to reduce the PAR leading to significant improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), enabling more effective target echo cancellation.The proposed IHGSOA-based echo cancellation model effectively aligns the cancellation and echo signals through time-delay synchronization, minimizing errors even in the presence of a mismatch.The simulation results show that using the above cancelling system the desired target echo amplitude drops to 50% and 40% of its original target echo, hence the system has a very high cancellation effect.Thus, the effectiveness of the IHGSOA is evaluated by comparing its performance with other conventional algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207