MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409973255 · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2025.04.011

Association of 24 h-movement behaviors with cerebral and hippocampal amyloid beta levels and executive function in cognitively normal older adults: a compositional data analysis from the AGUEDA trial

2025· article· en· W4409973255 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Sclafani, Jairo H. Migueles, Marcos Olvera‐Rojas, Patricio Solis‐Urra, Beatriz Fernandez‐Gamez, Andrea Coca‐Pulido, Darío Bellón, Javier Fernández-Ortega, Javier Sanchez‐Martinez, Lucía Sánchez‐Aranda, Ángel Toval, Isabel Martín‐Fuentes, Esmée A. Bakker, Juan Domingo Gispert, Eva María Triviño‐Ibáñez, Teresa Liu‐Ambrose, Kirk I. Erickson, Manuel Gómez-Río, Francisco B. Ortega, Irene Esteban‐Cornejo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of science and medicine in sport · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadEuropean Social FundEuropean Regional Development FundMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsBETA (programming language)Association (psychology)Hippocampal formationNeurosciencePsychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the associations between movement behaviors (physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep duration), global and hippocampal amyloid beta levels, and executive function in cognitively normal older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the Active Gains in brain Using Exercise During Aging study, including 86 participants (mean age 71.51 years, 57% female). METHODS: Movement behaviors were assessed using a wrist-worn accelerometer over a 9-day. Amyloid beta levels were quantified via positron emission tomography, and executive function was assessed using validated cognitive tests (e.g., Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Spatial Working Memory test, and Dimensional Change Card Sort test). Compositional data analysis and multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations, adjusting for age, sex, education, and APOEε4 genotype status. RESULTS: No significant associations emerged between any movement behaviors and total cerebral amyloid beta levels or executive function (all p > 0.05). However, higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was significantly associated with lower hippocampal amyloid levels in males (β = -0.039, p = 0.010), but not in females (β = 0.004, p = 0.741) (Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity × sex interaction p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Movement behaviors were not associated with global amyloid levels or executive function. However, higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity may be protective against hippocampal amyloid levels in older males. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential sex differences. These results underscore the importance of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in brain health and suggest avenues for future research on the role of movement behaviors in amyloid burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of science and medicine in sportSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207