MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409975129 · doi:10.21474/ijar01/20695

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF THE HIP: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON FUNCTIONAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES

2025· article· en· W4409975129 on OpenAlex
Kandregula Rama Rohan, Ganganapalli Phanikumar, Tejaswi Enikepalli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvascular necrosisRadiological weaponObservational studyMedicineTotal hip arthroplastyArthroplastyHip arthroplastyHip surgeryProspective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicineFemoral head

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a debilitating condition that leads to progressive joint destruction and functional impairment. Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains the definitive treatment for advanced-stage AVN (Ficat-Arlet III/IV), yet variations in outcomes based on patient demographics, aetiology, and surgical approaches necessitate further investigation. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of THR in AVN patients over a 26-month duration. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 50 patients diagnosed with AVN of the hip who underwent THR. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain relief. Radiological outcomes, surgical approaches (Southern Moore vs. Hardinge), complications, and range of motion (ROM) improvements were analysed. Statistical significance was determined using paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Significant functional improvement was observed with HHS increasing by 116.2% at 12 months (p < 0.001) and VAS scores improving by 77.8% (p < 0.001). Post-traumatic AVN patients exhibited superior outcomes (HHS: 92.1) compared to steroid-induced cases (HHS: 89.2). Radiological evaluation confirmed satisfactory implant positioning in all cases, with 92% showing optimal osseointegration and mild radiolucency (<2 mm) in 8%. ROM improved significantly, with internal rotation (+137.5%) and adduction (+111.3%) showing the highest gains. The Southern Moore approach was associated with 2 cases (4%) of neurapraxia (foot drop), while the Hardinge approach had no neurovascular complications. No cases of periprosthetic fractures, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or implant loosening were recorded. Conclusions: THR in AVN patients significantly improves function, reduces pain, and restores mobility, with better outcomes in younger patients (<40 years) and post-traumatic AVN cases. The study reinforces the efficacy of fenestrated cemented femoral stems in promoting osseointegration. The Southern Moore approach carries a higher risk of nerve injury, necessitating careful patient selection. Further long-term studies are required to assess implant longevity and the impact of surgical techniques on long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it