MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409975129 · doi:10.21474/ijar01/20695

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF THE HIP: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON FUNCTIONAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES

2025· article· en· W4409975129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kandregula Rama Rohan, Ganganapalli Phanikumar, Tejaswi Enikepalli

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvascular necrosisRadiological weaponObservational studyMedicineTotal hip arthroplastyArthroplastyHip arthroplastyHip surgeryProspective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicineFemoral head

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a debilitating condition that leads to progressive joint destruction and functional impairment. Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains the definitive treatment for advanced-stage AVN (Ficat-Arlet III/IV), yet variations in outcomes based on patient demographics, aetiology, and surgical approaches necessitate further investigation. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of THR in AVN patients over a 26-month duration. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 50 patients diagnosed with AVN of the hip who underwent THR. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain relief. Radiological outcomes, surgical approaches (Southern Moore vs. Hardinge), complications, and range of motion (ROM) improvements were analysed. Statistical significance was determined using paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Significant functional improvement was observed with HHS increasing by 116.2% at 12 months (p < 0.001) and VAS scores improving by 77.8% (p < 0.001). Post-traumatic AVN patients exhibited superior outcomes (HHS: 92.1) compared to steroid-induced cases (HHS: 89.2). Radiological evaluation confirmed satisfactory implant positioning in all cases, with 92% showing optimal osseointegration and mild radiolucency (<2 mm) in 8%. ROM improved significantly, with internal rotation (+137.5%) and adduction (+111.3%) showing the highest gains. The Southern Moore approach was associated with 2 cases (4%) of neurapraxia (foot drop), while the Hardinge approach had no neurovascular complications. No cases of periprosthetic fractures, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or implant loosening were recorded. Conclusions: THR in AVN patients significantly improves function, reduces pain, and restores mobility, with better outcomes in younger patients (<40 years) and post-traumatic AVN cases. The study reinforces the efficacy of fenestrated cemented femoral stems in promoting osseointegration. The Southern Moore approach carries a higher risk of nerve injury, necessitating careful patient selection. Further long-term studies are required to assess implant longevity and the impact of surgical techniques on long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced ResearchSame topicBone and Joint DiseasesFrench-language works237,207