MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409980520 · doi:10.3389/fopht.2025.1525183

Isolated third cranial nerve palsy as the presenting sign of tuberculum sellae meningioma: a case report

2025· article· en· W4409980520 on OpenAlexaff
Fay Althunayyan, Shuroq Alshehri, Hosam Al-Jehani

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeningiomaSurgeryCranial nervesTuberculum sellaeMononeuropathyAnatomyPeripheral neuropathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) is an uncommon tumor among all intracranial meningiomas. As these tumors grow, they compress the surrounding structures, including the optic nerves and the pituitary gland. Ocular motor nerve palsy (OMNP) can occur as an isolated mononeuropathy or as part of multiple cranial nerve palsies. The role of corticosteroids in the management of OMNP has not been fully studied in the literature. In this report, we present a case of a previously well middle-aged woman who presented with severe headache and isolated OMNP on examination. MRI of the brain showed a small TSM that extends into the right optic canal. In our case, we noted the expedient and complete recovery of isolated OMNP within a few days following treatment with dexamethasone. This case report is on an isolated OMNP associated with TSM, which has not been previously reported. In addition, it highlights the role of corticosteroids in achieving rapid recovery from OMNP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in OphthalmologySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207