MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409983788 · doi:10.1121/10.0036369

Mass-spring model for a perforated periodic metamaterial in nonlinear regime

2025· article· en· W4409983788 on OpenAlexafffund
Maël Lopez, Tenon Charly Kone, Alla Eddine Benchikh Le Hocine, Thomas Dupont, Raymond Panneton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReactancePerforationMechanicsAcousticsMaterials scienceAcoustic impedanceMetamaterialNonlinear systemSound pressureReynolds numberAirflowElectrical impedancePhysicsTurbulenceComposite materialThermodynamicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is interested in the nonlinear acoustic response of a metamaterial composed of a periodic array of single-perforation plates spaced by thin air cavities. An equivalent mass-spring model is adapted to predict the metamaterial acoustic response under high sound pressure levels. The increase in losses induced by the high level is considered by a quadratic law for the airflow resistivity in an effective fluid model. The airflow resistivity coefficients are determined from predictions by the computational fluid dynamics method at different flow velocities. The model is validated with impedance tube measurements for samples with different numbers of periodic unit cells and perforation sizes. The results show that the acoustic resistance of the metamaterial increases with increasing sound pressure levels, while the reactance is almost unchanged. The absorption peaks at low frequencies are more impacted by high sound pressure levels. A criterion based on the viscous characteristic frequency is proposed to determine the limit of the beginnings of the nonlinear material response. This limit is given by an acoustic Reynolds number, which depends on the frequency and perforation size. Experimentally, an absorption peak is observed, shifting to lower frequencies with increasing sound levels. A preliminary explanation of underlying mechanisms is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207