MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409987157 · doi:10.1107/s2052520625002781

Shifting and tilting towards enhanced piezoelectricity in high-temperature ceramics: an average structure study of (1 −  <i>x</i> )BiFe <sub>2/8</sub> Ti <sub>3/8</sub> Mg <sub>3/8</sub> O <sub>3</sub> – <i>x</i> PbTiO <sub>3</sub> through X-ray and neutron diffraction

2025· article· en· W4409987157 on OpenAlexafffund
Brooke N. Richtik, Alicia Manjón‐Sanz, Michelle Dolgos

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsCeramicPiezoelectricityMaterials scienceCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive report is provided of the average structure of a high Curie temperature ferroelectric ceramic, (1 − x )BiFe 2/8 Ti 3/8 Mg 3/8 O 3 – x PbTiO 3 (BFTM– x PT) when x = 0.25–0.375 at room temperature. Both neutron and synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data were collected and combined Rietveld refinements were completed. These data revealed that, of the compositions studied, BFTM– x PT crystallizes as mixed phase material. At x = 0.25–0.275, the average structure of each phase is best described by space groups R 3 c and Cc . At 0.30 ≥ x ≥ 0.35, a morphotropic phase boundary is present and is best modelled by space groups P 4 mm and Cc , where space group Cc is the dominant phase. As the concentration of PbTiO 3 increases, the amount of octahedral tilting decreases and x = 0.375 exhibits a loss of octahedral tilting and crystallizes in space groups P 4 mm and Cm . An updated phase diagram at room temperature of this novel system is given and structural intricacies responsible for its piezoelectric properties are revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and MaterialsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207