Landfill biocell technology for northern climates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Landfill Biocell concept, developed by Canadian researchers to address the challenge of operating waste cells sustainably in cold and semi-arid conditions, introduces an innovative approach to solid waste management. This technology utilizes a three-stage operation with the first stage involving anaerobic waste degradation incorporating leachate recirculation and biogas collection for energy recovery. Once biogas production ceases, aeration of the waste cell effectively transforms the biocell into an in-ground composter. The final stage involves mining to recover resources and reclaim space, demonstrating sustainability. This approach addresses numerous concerns with conventional sanitary landfills, including greenhouse gas emissions, and resource and space depletion. The Calgary Biocell, operational from 2006 to 2022 in Calgary, Alberta, pioneered this concept in North America. The biogas production rates exceeded those of conventional landfills by several orders of magnitude. The data collected over a period of 16 years provided valuable insights to develop new waste kinetic parameters tailored to Canadian waste cells operated as landfill bioreactors. Laboratory testing of excavated waste residue showed its potential for energy generation through gasification and its suitability as a landfill biocover medium, albeit with some enhancements. Overall, the demonstration project in Calgary showed the viability of the biocell concept as a sustainable waste management solution in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".