Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to provide models that interpret gravity and interactions by entropy. We introduce D+-division partial entropy by applying ideas of the logistic function to its entropy and define the inverse of D+-division partial entropy as the gravitational potential. By applying these concepts, we attempt to explain as follows: 1) Gravity becomes a constant value within small distances under specific conditions. Gravity may have 5-states within small enough distances. There may exist anti-gravity which is the opposite of Newton’s gravity among 5-states. Furthermore, the gravitational potential and the Coulomb potential can be treated similarly within small distances. 2) The rotation speed of the galaxy does not depend on its radius if the radius is within the size level of the universe. 3) The gravitational acceleration toward the center may fluctuate at long distance compared to Newton’s gravity. These become the extension of Newton’s gravity and suggest that there may exist constants that control gravity and the speed of galaxies. Besides, it describes the relationship between the Yukawa type potential and D--division partial entropy with negative. We attempt to suggest 11-types interactions including the gravitational acceleration g and compare the ratios of fundamental 4-interactions in nature using suggested equations. Furthermore, we mention that the relationship with entropic gravity, that the possibility of existence new interactions, and that the gravitational constant G can fluctuate if entropy changes. Gravity and electromagnetic and quantum may unify through entropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".