A Regional Experience of Adult Granulosa Cell Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Adult granulosa cell tumours (AGCT) of the ovary account for 2–5% of ovarian tumours, with 30% occurring in women of childbearing age. Despite a good prognosis, up to 25% recur. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide management. Objective: To describe management of AGCT across multiple gynaecological cancer centres. Methods: Retrospective analysis of electronic patient records from six gynaecological cancer centres in Southwest England between 2000 and 2021 (n = 119). Results: We included 107 patients with a median follow-up of 60 months (0–261 months). Most (97/107; 90.7%) were diagnosed with stage I disease (31.8% stage Ic). Primary management was staging surgery in 33/107 (30.8%), hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) (28/107; 26.2%), or conservation of an ovary (17/107; 15.9%). Three had a subsequent pregnancy. A quarter (27/107; 25.2%) were diagnosed with recurrent disease. Fifteen patients (15/107; 14%) had multiple recurrences. Recurrence was more likely if cyst rupture was reported at surgery (38.7%) compared with no rupture (14.3%; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher with ovarian conservation (6/17; 35.3%) compared with BSO (21/90; 23.3%; p < 0.01), and all recurrences involved the residual ovary. Of the 11 deaths, 6 (54.5%) were attributed to progressive disease. Conclusions: Although survival with early-stage disease is good, ovarian cystectomy or unilateral ovarian conservation was associated with increased risk of recurrence. There is no conclusive evidence to support a contralateral oophorectomy in pre-menopausal women, but completion surgery should at least be considered, either immediately or after childbearing/assisted reproductive treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".