MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410006109 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i3.3564

Next-Generation Medicines for Neurological and Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Discovery to Commercialization

2023· article· en· W4410006109 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahesh Recharla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommercializationDrug discoveryNeuroscienceMedicineBusinessPsychologyBioinformaticsBiologyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book delves deeply into the discovery, preclinical and clinical development, and commercialization of next-generation medicines designed to treat neurological and neurodegenerative disorders. The book also covers pharmacologic targeting of the gut-brain axis in neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, the associated obstacles, challenges, and technologies involved, and the role of nanomedicines in addressing some of those challenges. The editors invited leading scientists and researchers with established credentials in CNS drug development and related technologies to contribute to the writing of the chapters. As a consequence, the editor and the readers are presented with a unique perspective of a selection of novel ideas, technologies, and medicines that have the potential to transform the current therapeutic landscape. The book is aimed primarily toward those in the pharmaceutical industry and academia who are involved in the development of drugs for treating CNS disorders. It will also serve as a valuable resource for technology transfer organizations and venture capital firms for selecting and investing in therapeutic ideas for treating CNS disorders. When we think of neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, we typically think of old age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disorders. While it is true that these diseases are responsible for the bulk of the societal and economic cost of CNS disorders, it is also true that CNS disorders are typically difficult to treat as a collective group because they have many general challenges in drug development in common, regardless of patient population or phase of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.463
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyFrench-language works237,207