Luminal Sweet Sensing and Enteric Nervous System Participate in Regulation of Intestinal Glucose Transporter, GLUT2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Dietary glucose is transported across the intestinal absorptive cell into the systemic circulation by the apically located Na+-dependent glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1, SLC5A1) and basally residing Na+-independent glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2, SLC2A2). Whilst recent experimental evidence has shown that sensing of sweet compounds by the gut-expressed sweet taste receptor T1R2–T1R3 and glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor signalling are components of the pathway controlling SGLT1 expression, little is known about the mechanisms involved in the regulation of GLUT2. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that T1R2–T1R3 and its downstream signalling pathway participate in the regulation of intestinal GLUT2. Methods: We used in vivo and in vitro approaches employing a weaning pig model, a heterologous expression assay, and knockout mice for elucidating the regulation of GLUT2 by luminal sugars. Results: A plant-based sweetener formulation included in piglets’ diet led to a marked increase in GLUT2 expression in piglets’ intestine, compared to controls. The sweeteners that do not activate pig T1R2–T1R3 failed to upregulate GLUT2. There was a significant increase in GLUT2 expression when the sweetener sucralose, which activates T1R2–T1R3, was included in the drinking water of wild-type mice. However, in knockout mice, in which the genes for the sweet receptor subunit T1R3 and the associated G-protein gustducin were deleted, there was no upregulation of GLUT2 expression in response to sucralose supplementation. There was a notable increase in GLUT2 expression in wild-type mice fed a high-carbohydrate diet compared to when maintained on a low-carbohydrate diet. However, in GLP-2 receptor knockout mice kept on the high-carbohydrate diet, there was no enhancement in GLUT2 expression. Conclusions: The experimental evidence suggests that luminal sweet sensing via T1R2–T1R3 and the enteroendocrine-derived GLP-2 are constituents of the regulatory pathway controlling GLUT2 expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".