MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410008638 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/add288

FPGA-based intelligent bearing fault diagnosis under varying-speed conditions

2025· article· en· W4410008638 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maosong Cheng, Yong-Bo Wei, Zhimin Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayBearing (navigation)Computer scienceFault (geology)Embedded systemAutomotive engineeringReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although machine learning has made remarkable advancements in addressing complex classification tasks for non-stationary signals, this artificial intelligence technique still faces deployment challenges in real-time industrial applications due to substantial computational requirements and prolonged processing times. In this study, a fault diagnosis framework based on Kalman filter-based empirical mode decomposition (KF-EMD) and a back propagation neural network (BPNN) is implemented on an field-programmable gate array (FPGA) for real-time bearing fault diagnosis. First, angular domain resampling is employed to compensate for speed variations. Then, KF-EMD is applied to decompose the resampled signal in the angular domain, generating multiple intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) in parallel. Finally, a lightweight BPNN is utilized to perform real-time fault classification based on features extracted from these IMFs. The proposed method was validated using a bearing fault dataset from the University of Ottawa, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 99.61%. Real-time diagnostic experiments using pre-stored data on the FPGA demonstrated the effectiveness of the approach in balancing computational efficiency and diagnostic accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207