MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410014345 · doi:10.1016/j.cmicom.2025.105079

Approach to Clostridioides difficile diarrheal infection

2025· article· en· W4410014345 on OpenAlexaff
Connor Prosty, Angela Huttner, Todd C. Lee, Emily G. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueCMI Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridioidesDiarrheal diseaseDiarrheal diseasesDiarrheaC difficileMicrobiologyVirologyMedicineBiologyClostridium difficileInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, with significant morbidity and mortality. CDI predominantly affects adults, with community-acquired cases on the rise. Following the first episode of CDI, 15-25% of patients will develop a recurrence. Mortality associated with CDI can approach 13.5% among patients 80 years and older. The differential diagnosis for CDI includes infectious colitis, with various other types of infectious colitis ( e.g ., cytomegalovirus, Klebsiella oxytoca, Escherichia coli 0157:H7), as well as non-infectious etiologies (e.g., Behcet’s disease, collagenous colitis, inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], ischemic colitis). Most treatment guidelines currently recommend fidaxomicin or vancomycin for initial non-fulminant CDI for 10 days. Metronidazole should be reserved for settings where first-line agents are unavailable. Recurrent cases may necessitate pulse-tapered regimens, faecal microbiota transplant or other microbiome-directed therapy. For fulminant CDI, high-dose enteral or rectal vancomycin, sometimes with adjunctive intravenous metronidazole or, in some jurisdictions tigecycline could be considered. Despite the advances in diagnosis and treatment, there are still important evidence gaps surrounding prevention, testing strategies, and management. High-quality clinical trials are required to compare effectiveness and determine the optimal treatment choice and duration for first episodes, first relapses, and subsequent relapses, as well as the role of preventive microbiota-restoring therapies and other forms of primary and secondary prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMI CommunicationsSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207