MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410016261 · doi:10.32799/ijih.v20i2.43248

Instructions have been provided: Addressing Indigenous-Specific Racism and Implementing Foundational Obligations to Indigenous Peoples

2025· article· en· W4410016261 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jorden Hendry, Danièle Behn Smith, Bonnie Henry, Amber Louie, Kate Jongbloed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Indigenous Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaQLT (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsIndigenousRacismIndigenous cultureSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsEngineeringEcologyBiologyGender studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Growing calls to recognize racism as a determinant of health underscores the need for evidence-based tools addressing Indigenous-specific racism in health services, particularly within public health. Indigenous resistance to genocide and assimilation in Canada has led to the current era of truth and reconciliation. Since 2015, a series of national and regional commissions and inquiries have led to the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples into law, as well as over 400 recommendations for actions to eradicate Indigenous-specific racism. We call these our “Foundational Obligations to Indigenous Peoples.” This study introduces a tool designed to measure and address these Foundational Obligations, aiming to confront the unmet responsibility public health has to eradicate Indigenous-specific racism. Methods: Within BC’s Office of the Provincial Health Officer (OPHO), we developed a mixed-method tool “Action on Foundational Obligations to Indigenous Peoples Self-Assessment," where participants quantitatively assess their engagement with reports and recommendations related to Indigenous rights and reconciliation. Qualitative insights delve into the reasoning behind rankings, identifying barriers, facilitators, and support needs for upholding Foundational Obligations. Results: The baseline survey in June 2022 revealed substantial variability in awareness and action across the OPHO. Seven pragmatic themes emerged from qualitative data that inform the work to arrest white supremacy & Indigenous-specific racism. Knowledge Translation: To address the gaps in knowledge, a workshop series— 'Foundational Obligations Series'— was created to educate staff on essential reports, acts, and inquiries that offer clear guidance for addressing both Indigenous-specific racism and white supremacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Indigenous HealthSame topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207