Using Machine Learning to Predict Cognitive Decline in Older Adults From the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey: Model Development and Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment, indicative of Alzheimer disease and other forms of dementia, significantly deteriorates the quality of life of older adult populations and imposes considerable burdens on families and health care systems worldwide. The early identification of individuals at risk for cognitive impairment through a convenient and rapid method is crucial for the timely implementation of interventions. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the application of machine learning (ML) to integrate blood biomarkers, life behaviors, and disease history to predict the decline in cognitive function. Methods: This approach uses data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. A total of 2688 participants aged 65 years or older from the 2008-2009, 2011-2012, and 2014 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey waves were included, with cognitive impairment defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score below 18. The dataset was divided into a training set (n=1331), an internal test set (n=333), and a prospective validation set (n=1024). Participants with a baseline MMSE score of less than 18 were excluded from the cohort to ensure a more accurate assessment of cognitive function. We developed ML models that integrate demographic information, health behaviors, disease history, and blood biomarkers to predict cognitive function at the 3-year follow-up point, specifically identifying individuals who are at risk of experiencing significant declines in cognitive function by that time. Specifically, the models aimed to identify individuals who would experience a significant decline in their MMSE scores (less than 18) by the end of the follow-up period. The performance of these models was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: All ML models outperformed the MMSE alone. The balanced random forest achieved the highest accuracy (88.5% in the internal test set and 88.7% in the prospective validation set), albeit with a lower sensitivity, while logistic regression recorded the highest sensitivity. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis identified instrumental activities of daily living, age, and baseline MMSE scores as the most influential predictors for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: The incorporation of blood biomarkers, along with demographic, life behavior, and disease history into ML models offers a convenient, rapid, and accurate approach for the early identification of older adult individuals at risk of cognitive impairment. This method presents a valuable tool for health care professionals to facilitate timely interventions and underscores the importance of integrating diverse data types in predictive health models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".