Intraosseous needle for management of subacute and chronic subdural hematoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using an intraosseous (IO) needle for decompressive management of subacute and chronic subdural hematomas (SDHs). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of subacute and chronic SDHs treated with IO needle decompression from May 2022 to November 2023. Technical success, recurrence, procedure-related complications, major adverse events, patient demographics, and procedural details were analyzed using standard statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age 75.4 [SD 11.4] years) met the inclusion criteria. Technical success was achieved in all patients, with only 1 case of recurrence. Rates of procedure-related complications (3/51, 5.9%) and major adverse events (2/51, 4%) were low. There were no statistically significant differences between those with subacute SDHs compared with those with chronic SDHs. CONCLUSIONS: IO needle decompression is a feasible, safe, and effective option for management of subacute and chronic SDHs, with minimal recurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".