Biomimetic culture substrates for modelling homeostatic intestinal epithelium in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing interest in utilizing three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models with innovative biomaterials to engineer functional tissues arises from the limitations of conventional cell culture methods in accurately reproducing the complex physiological conditions of living organisms. This study presents a strategy for replicating the intricate microenvironment of the intestine by cultivating intestinal cells within bioinspired 3D interfaces that recapitulate the villus-crypt architecture and 3D tissue arrangement of the intestine. Intestinal cells cultured on these biomimetic substrates exhibited phenotypes and differentiation characteristics resembling intestinal-specific cell types, effectively replicating intestinal tissue. Notably, tissue proliferation and differentiation were achieved within 72-120 h-significantly faster than the several weeks required by conventional bioengineered materials, which often pose risks of tissue necrosis or cross-contamination. Additionally, the differentiated cells on these villi-crypts mimicking bio-interfaces exhibit higher production of natural antimicrobial peptides, resulting in reduced pathogenic infection compared to control samples. Furthermore, our method stands out for simplicity in fabrication, eliminating the need for cleanroom procedures and complex microfabrication techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".