MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two-dimensional hydrodynamic viscous electron flow in annular Corbino rings

2025· article· en· W4410033114 on OpenAlexafffund
Sujatha Vijayakrishnan, Z. Berkson-Korenberg, J. Mainville, L. W. Engel, M. P. Lilly, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, G. Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceHoneywellCenter for Integrated NanotechnologiesSandia National LaboratoriesMcGill UniversityPrinceton UniversityGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMechanicsPhysicsFlow (mathematics)ElectronElectron flowNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of fluidic viscosity is ubiquitous in condensed-matter systems hosting a continuum where macroscopic properties can emerge. While an important property of liquids and some solids, only recently was the viscosity of an electron shown to play a role in electronic transport experiments. In this Letter, we present nonlocal electronic transport measurements in concentric annular rings formed in high-mobility two-dimensional electron gases, and the resulting data show that viscous hydrodynamic flow can occur far away from the source-drain current region. Our conclusion of viscous electronic transport is further corroborated by simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations that are found to be in agreement with our measurements below <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> <a:mspace width="4pt"/> <a:mtext>K</a:mtext> </a:mrow> </a:math> . Finally, this work emphasizes the key role played by viscosity via electron-electron <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mo>(</c:mo> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mtext>−</c:mtext> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mo>)</c:mo> </c:mrow> </c:math> interaction even when the electronic transport is restricted radially, and for which it should have played no major role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207