Meaning of Person‐Inclusive Care and Care Expectations of Transgender Individuals From Healthcare Professionals: An Integrative Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To comprehensively understand the meaning of person inclusive care and the care expectations of transgender individuals from health care professionals. DESIGN: An integrative review was conducted. DATA SOURCES: Literature was searched in four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) and 25 qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies published during January 2019-October 2024 were included. METHODS: All articles were critically appraised using validated critical appraisal tools. Deductive and constant comparative analyses were used to develop themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: Person inclusive care was described as: (a) recognition and respect of identity, (b) holistic and individualised care and (c) creating safe and affirming healthcare environments. Care expectations included: (a) empowerment through shared decision-making, (b) person-centred communication, (c) advocacy as a supportive gesture and (d) intersectionality-informed care. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the critical importance of person-inclusive care for transgender individuals, emphasising the need for healthcare practices that respect and affirm their identities, provide holistic care, and foster safe and supportive environments. IMPACT: Transgender individuals experience persistent stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings and beyond. Understanding how to provide person-inclusive care and their care expectations from healthcare professionals is crucial to improving the delivery of quality care. The current body of evidence underscores significant disparities in healthcare for transgender individuals. While advancements in inclusive practices and affirming care models are evident in specific settings, these practices are not universally adopted. Inclusive care equips healthcare professionals with the necessary competencies to deliver high-quality, sensitive care that meets the unique needs of transgender individuals, ultimately fostering trust and equitable health outcomes. Nurses must ensure the delivery of person-inclusive care by demonstrating respect, advocacy, holistic assessment and care and genuine involvement of transgender individuals in decision-making for their care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No direct patient or public contribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".