Peri-operative protein or amino acid supplementation for total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) affects weight-bearing joints, such as hips and knees, and its prevalence is rising due to factors like obesity and aging. Muscle atrophy, exacerbated by aging and surgery, increases the risk of joint instability and falls. Orthopedic surgeons explore dietary interventions to counteract these effects, with protein supplementation (PS) showing promise. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of PS in arthroplasty patients, comparing findings with sports medicine and sarcopenia literature. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase (February 2025) for protein and amino acid supplementation studies in total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) patients. The quality assessment used the Cochrane risk of bias and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis calculated effect sizes for muscle atrophy and strength outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (903 patients) evaluated oral or intravenous protein/amino acid supplementation over a mean follow-up of 55.2 days. Essential amino acids (EAA) significantly reduced muscle atrophy in quadriceps femoris muscle mass (SMD: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.95) and hamstring muscle mass (SMD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.55). However, effects on intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and muscle thickness (MT) were inconsistent. Muscle strength outcomes varied, with no significant effect on quadriceps muscle strength (QMS) or handgrip strength (HGS). Intravenous amino acid infusion improved muscle protein synthesis and reduced perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Protein and amino acid supplementation can reduce muscle atrophy in hip or knee arthroplasty patients. While effects on muscle strength and function are mixed, intravenous supplementation offers benefits. Further standardized research is needed to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration code (CRD42024555899).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".