MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410050821 · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duaf022

Massive declines and local recoveries: First range-wide assessment spotlights ending egg-taking as key to the survival of <i>Macrocephalon maleo</i> (Maleo)

2025· article· en· W4410050821 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marcy Summers, Matthew Geary, Johny S. Tasirin, Nurlin Djuni, L Summers, Pandji A. Kresno, Agustian Laya, Stallin M Sawuwu, Adrianus Bawotong, Wiranto Abas, Vivi Tan Oga, Ahmad Muh. Nur, Moh. Isfandri, Peter Robertson, Philip J.K. McGowan, Nigel Collar

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Conservation Fund of CanadaBadan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
KeywordsKey (lock)Range (aeronautics)BiologyEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The communally nesting, Critically Endangered Macrocephalon maleo (Maleo) is an iconic species endemic to Sulawesi, Indonesia, yet despite decades of legal protection its populations have declined sharply across its range. We performed the first-ever range-wide field survey of Maleo nesting grounds, visiting 122 known and identifying 58 previously unrecorded sites, collecting physical and biological data and interviewing local informants at each. We added information from the literature for another 48 abandoned sites, documenting a total of 228 historic and current nesting grounds. We then constructed a profile of historic and current populations and area of occupancy (AOO) units across Sulawesi. Between 1980 and 2019, 55% of active nesting grounds became inactive, and all but one of the 94 sites that remained active hosted fewer birds in 2019. In 2019, 85% of all 228 known nesting grounds were either completely abandoned or just barely active, hosting no more than 2 pairs day–1 at peak season. However, conservation efforts have also produced significant recoveries and discoveries. Our survey increased the range of described landscape types where Maleo nest from 2 to 4, and documented Maleo nesting in previously unrecorded places, including artificially created sandy areas. As the Maleo’s maximum travel distance (MTD) beyond nesting grounds is unknown, we applied a cost-based approach using possible MTDs of 25, 40, and 50 km to define AOO “Units” that represent a set of separate range-wide subpopulations defined by each MTD. Between 1980 and 2019, the overall AOO declined by 37%, 26%, and 19% at MTDs of 25, 40, and 50 km, respectively; the number of active nesting grounds in each isolated Unit declined by 58%, 78%, and 80%, respectively; and fragmentation (i.e., the total number of Units) increased by 5%, 100%, and 125%, respectively. In some areas, Maleo may be changing their behavior in response to egg predation by humans. Ending egg-taking has now clearly been shown to produce Maleo increases in multiple locations and is crucial to range-wide recovery of the species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological applicationsSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207