MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410057024 · doi:10.18103/mra.v13i4.6346

GHR106, the First in Class Antibody-based GnRH Antagonist for Broad Clinical Applications

2025· article· en· W4410057024 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregory Lee, Bixia Ge, Andrew Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Research Archives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClass (philosophy)AntibodyAntagonistMedicineComputer sciencePharmacologyMathematicsInternal medicineArtificial intelligenceImmunologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last two decades, our laboratory has identified and studied a GHR106 monoclonal antibody which was generated against N1-29 oligopeptide located in the extracellular domains of human GnRH receptor. GHR106 was shown to exhibit bioactivities as GnRH antagonist, similar to those of small molecules such as Cetrorelix and Elagolix, except that former has a much longer half-life (days vs. hours). Previous studies have indicated that GnRH receptor is localized mainly in anterior pituitary and placenta during pregnancy as well as other reproduction-related tissues in minor amount. It was also known that GnRH receptor is highly expressed among different cancer cells. By using GHR106 and other GnRH antagonists as the target probe, the biological functions of GnRH receptor were found to be tissue-dependent. When acting on the pituitary receptor, GHR106 can cause reversible suppressions of reproductive hormones, such as gonadotropins, E2 and progesterone, whereas HCG and E2, progesterone were suppressed upon targeting to placental GnRH receptor to cause pregnancy terminations. Therefore, we believe that GHR106 is a suitable long acting GnRH antagonist for control of fertility regulations and terminations of ectopic pregnancy and can be used to treat numerous related gynecological diseases. On the other hand, when targeting the same receptor on cancer cells, GHR106 will induce cellular apoptosis to almost all cancer cells. Therefore, GHR106 is also beneficial to immunotherapeutic applications of many human cancers, irrespective of their hormone dependence. Additional modifications of this unique antibody are likely in the future, including CAR (chimeric antigen receptor)-T cell constructs, bispecific antibody formulations and/or antibody drug conjugates. Based on our comprehensive studies, GHR106 can be developed into antibody drugs of multi-indications and could be more beneficial to the existing small molecular GnRH antagonists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Research Archives→Same topicSexual Differentiation and Disorders→French-language works237,207→