MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410074430 · doi:10.18502/jchr.v14i10.18568

Study of Prosodic Skills of Persian-Speaking Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on the Persian Version of Montreal Protocol for the Evaluation of Communication (P.M.E.C.)

2025· article· en· W4410074430 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shahed Zandiehrad, Shahla Raghibdoust, Mohammad Taghi Joghataei, Arsalan Golfam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Community Health Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersianAutism spectrum disorderPsychologyProtocol (science)AutismClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineLinguisticsAlternative medicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Research indicates that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often struggle with prosodic skills, which include the rhythm, stress, and intonation of speech. While most studies focus on children, some findings suggest these challenges persist into adulthood. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study used a quantitative approach to assess prosodic impairments in Persian-speaking adults with ASD. Thirteen Persian-speaking men with autism, aged 25 to 44 (mean = 32.84, SD = 4.17), participated. Their educational backgrounds ranged from third grade to 20 years of formal education. A control group of 26 healthy Persian-speaking men matched in age and education was also included. Prosodic skills were evaluated using five subtests from the Persian version of the Montreal Protocol for the Evaluation of Communication (P.M.E.C.): linguistic prosody comprehension, linguistic prosody repetition, emotional prosody comprehension, emotional prosody repetition, and emotional prosody production. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results: Participants with ASD performed significantly worse than the control group across all five subtests. Significant differences were found in linguistic prosody comprehension (p = 0.002), linguistic prosody repetition (p = 0.0001), emotional prosody comprehension (p = 0.004), emotional prosody repetition (p = 0.015), and emotional prosody production (p = 0.0001). These results highlight substantial deficits in both linguistic and emotional prosody among adults with ASD. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need for targeted assessment and intervention strategies for prosodic impairments in adults with autism. The findings have practical implications for clinical, educational, and research settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Community Health ResearchSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207