MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding Fear in Therapeutic Residential Care

2025· preprint· en· W4410081046 on OpenAlexaff
Yvonne Smith, Charles V. Izzo, Lisa A. McCabe, James P. Anglin, Michael Nunno

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren and Youth Services Review · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In therapeutic residential care (TRC), both children and staff sometimes experience fear. Little scholarship in our field has integrated the substantial contemporary research literatures on fear as a biopsychosocial phenomenon. Attending to what is known about how fear works at the individual, organizational, and cultural level is necessary to improve working conditions and quality of care in TRC. This article draws from neuroscience, psychology, and sociology to improve our biopsychosocial understanding of the experience and consequences of fear in TRC. These literatures demonstrate that: 1) Fear is a potentially adaptive response to threat involving conscious and nonconscious neural processes; 2) Fear (and all emotion categories) is shaped by culture and therefore varies; 3) Instances of fear are constructed based on our predictions about the future rather than being reactions to experience; 4) Individuals vary in their ability to experience fear and recognize it in others, and this variation is related to other capacities of great interest in child welfare; and 5) Children and staff learn to perform and experience emotions—including fear—through explicit and implicit education in the feeling rules of their organization and broader culture. We suggest actions organizations can take now to help children and staff better understand fear and develop more adaptive responses to it. We propose directions for future research on fear in TRC that can guide efforts to make child welfare involvement a less threatening experience for children, their families, and the people who care for them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueChildren and Youth Services ReviewSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207