MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Excitation-inhibition imbalance in the auditory cortex causes sound recognition impairment in noisy environment in hidden hearing loss mice

2025· article· en· W4410089280 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Zhu, Yihong Jiang, Chang Tong, Yang Fu, Kan Xing Wu, Zeyu Zheng, Zuoming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Research Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersKey Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAuditory cortexAudiologySound (geography)Hearing lossNeuroscienceSound exposurePsychologySpeech recognitionBiologyMedicineAcousticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noise–induced hidden hearing loss (HHL) is a type of hearing dysfunction caused by moderate noise exposure. It is clinically manifested as speech recognition impairment in noisy environments while the hearing threshold remains within the normal range. The mechanism by which noise exposure causes speech recognition impairment remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the excitation–inhibition status in the auditory cortex of HHL mice and its roles in sound recognition disability in noisy environments. A model of HHL in mice was induced using 110 decibels (dB) of helicopter noise for 2 h, the sound recognition–avoidance decision (SRAD) behavioral test was used to evaluate sound recognition ability. The activation level of excitatory neurons and the expression of vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGluT1) and glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) in the auditory cortex were observed. Mice were administered α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist NBQX. The results showed increased cFos expression in the auditory cortex of HHL mice and an upregulated ratio of activated CaMKⅡ + neurons. Furthermore, the expression of VGluT1 and GAD67 increased in an imbalanced manner under an 80 dB noise stimulus for 2 h. The SRAD behavioral tests showed the HHL mice maintained normal sound recognition ability under quiet conditions but not in a noisy environment. The NBQX treatment improved sound recognition but did not restore normal status. This study suggested that the excitation–inhibition imbalance in the auditory cortex of mice with HHL might be the direct cause of sound recognition disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Research BulletinSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207