MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410090200 · doi:10.24083/apjhm.v20i1.3913

The Impact of Opening a Private Hospital Emergency Department on the Hospital and Patient Characteristics

2025· article· en· W4410090200 on OpenAlexaff
Christiana Mustac, John C. Maxwell, Paola Chivers, Gordon S. Laing, Terry Bayliss

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia Pacific Journal of Health Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProject commissioningEmergency departmentPublishingMedical emergencyBusinessManagementEmergency medicineMedicinePolitical scienceNursingEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Australian public hospital emergency departments (EDs) are under increasing pressure with higher patient volumes, failure to meet triage target times and increased ambulance wait times. Further, there is limited literature exploring how the opening of an ED affects Australian hospitals. This study focuses on Hollywood Private Hospital (HPH), a large private hospital in Western Australian which opened their ED in November 2021. The research aimed to examine how the introduction of the ED influenced the hospital’s service demands and resourcing. Method: This study investigated hospital inpatient characteristics including admissions, clinical deterioration episodes, deaths, after-hours theatre activity and companion care hours. The investigation compared the periods 01 January to 30 June 2021 (2021) and 01 January to 30 June 2022 (2022) to identify differences pre and post the ED opening. Results: Overall, the number of inpatient admissions was similar from 2021 to 2022 (31,061 and 31,706 respectively). However, there was a statistically significant change in the admission type with a decrease in elective admissions (925.2 in 2021 and 880.4 in 2022 (p<.001)) and an increase in emergency admissions (67.4 in 2021 and 111.1 in 2022 (p<.001)). A significantly higher incidence rate of rapid response calls was reported in 2022 compared to 2021 (p=.043), nonetheless there was no difference in the incidence rates of cardiac arrest (p=.445), code blacks (p=.600) or patient deaths (p=.880). From 2021 to 2022 there was an increase in both after-hours theatre procedures (6.6% to 9.0%; χ2=50.9 p<.001) and median companion care hours (Md = 32.5 to Md=56.3; U=2.3, p=.021). Implications: The opening of the HPH ED resulted in increased after-hours and emergency related admissions with a co-occurring increase on companion hours. These impacts necessitate significant resourcing investment such as revised staffing models and rosters, additional recruitment, and change management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia Pacific Journal of Health ManagementSame topicPharmacy and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207