MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410091126 · doi:10.1111/eea.13580

Comparative demography of <i>Nilaparvata lugens</i> (Stål) reared on Bt rice and non‐Bt rice

2025· article· en· W4410091126 on OpenAlexaff
Sheng Lin, Y. J. Dong, Liette Vasseur, Shijun You, Xiaoyan Zhao, Xiangzhen Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural pest management studies
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersFujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyPEST analysisRice plantBt cottonOryza sativaAgronomyToxicologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The insect‐resistant rice variety mfb‐MH3301‐1, expressing Cry1Ab, has demonstrated robust resistance against Lepidopteran pests. However, its potential effects on non‐target organisms warrant further investigation. This study evaluated the effects of mfb‐MH3301‐1 in comparison with the parental rice variety MH3301 ( Oryza sativa L.) on the development of the insect pest Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). The results showed that there were no significant differences in female longevity, male longevity, lifespan, and mean generation time ( T ) between brown planthoppers fed on either mfb‐MH3301‐1 or MH3301. However, N. lugens individuals fed on mfb‐MH3301‐1 exhibited significantly higher fecundity, intrinsic rate of increase ( r ), finite rate of increase ( λ ), and net reproductive rate ( R 0 ) compared to those fed on MH3301. The study provides valuable insight into the management of N. lugens in the future cultivation of Bt rice, and attention should be paid to the population dynamics of N. lugens in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataSame topicAgricultural pest management studiesFrench-language works237,207