MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410091876 · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.5.7

Systematic Ocular Phenotyping of Knockout Mouse Lines Identifies Genes Associated With Age-Related Corneal Dystrophies

2025· article· en· W4410091876 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Briere, Thao Vo, Benjamin A. Yang, David J. Adams, Takanori Amano, Oana V. Amarie, Zorana Berberovic, Lynette Bower, Steve D. M. Brown, Samantha Burrill, Soo Young Cho, Sharon Clementson-Mobbs, Abigail D’Souza, Mohammad Eskandarian, Ann M. Flenniken, Helmut Fuchs, Valerie Gailus-Durner, Yann Hérault, Martin Hrabě de Angelis, Russell Joynson, Yeon Kyung Kang, Haerim Kim, Hiroshi Masuya, Hamid Méziane, Ki-Hoan Nam, Hyuna Noh, Lauryl M. J. Nutter, Marcela Pálková, Jan Procházka, Miles Joseph Raishbrook, Fabrice Riet, Jason Salazar, Radislav Sedlacek, Mohammed Selloum, Kyoung Yul Seo, Je Kyung Seong, Hae-Sol Shin, Toshihiko Shiroishi, Michelle Stewart, Karen L. Svenson, Masaru Tamura, Heather Tolentino, Sara Wells, Wolfgang Wurst, Atsushi Yoshiki, Louise Lanoue, K. C. Kent Lloyd, Brian C. Leonard, Michel J. Roux, Colin McKerlie, Ala Moshiri

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSinai Health SystemMount Sinai HospitalLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoToronto Centre for PhenogenomicsSickKids Foundation
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Eye InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthGovernment of CanadaINFRAFRONTIERAkademie Věd České RepublikyAgence Nationale de la RechercheOntario GenomicsGenome Canada
KeywordsKnockout mouseBiologyGeneOphthalmologyCorneal dystrophyGeneticsCorneaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: This study investigates genes contributing to late-adult corneal dystrophies (LACDs) in aged mice, with potential implications for late-onset corneal dystrophies (CDs) in humans. Methods: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) database, containing data from 8901 knockout mouse lines, was filtered to include late-adult mice (49+ weeks) with significant (P < 0.0001) CD phenotypes. Candidate genes were mapped to human orthologs using the Mouse Genome Informatics group, with expression analyzed via PLAE and a literature review for prior CD associations. Comparative analyses of LACD genes from IMPC and established human CD genes from IC3D included protein interactions (STRING), biological processes (PANTHER), and molecular pathways (KEGG). Results: Analysis identified 14 genes linked to late-adult abnormal corneal phenotypes. Of these, 2 genes were previously associated with CDs in humans, while 12 were novel. Seven of the 14 genes (50%) were expressed in the human cornea based on single-cell transcriptomics. Protein-protein interactions via STRING showed several significant interactions with known human CD genes. PANTHER analysis identified six biological processes shared with established human CD genes. Two genes (Rgs2 and Galnt9) were involved in pathways related to human corneal diseases, including cGMP-PKG signaling, mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis, and oxytocin signaling. Other candidates were implicated in pathways such as pluripotency of stem cells, MAPK signaling, WNT signaling, actin cytoskeleton regulation, and cellular senescence. Conclusions: This study identified 14 genes linked to LACD in knockout mice, 12 of which are novel in corneal biology. These genes may serve as potential therapeutic targets for treating corneal diseases in aging human populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207