Pengaruh Insentif Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Motivasi Kerja Pada Perumda Air Minum Tirta Mahameru Kabupaten Lumajang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh insentif dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai melalui motivasi kerja di Perumda Air Minum Tirta Mahameru Kabupaten Lumajang. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) berbasis Partial Least Square (PLS). Populasi penelitian terdiri dari seluruh pegawai tetap Perumda Air Minum Tirta Mahameru, yang berjumlah 70 orang, dan teknik sampel jenuh diterapkan untuk menjadikan seluruh populasi sebagai responden. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa insentif dan lingkungan kerja berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai. Selain itu, insentif dan lingkungan kerja juga berpengaruh terhadap motivasi kerja pegawai. Motivasi kerja terbukti memiliki peran mediasi dalam hubungan antara insentif dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai. Insentif yang diberikan kepada pegawai meningkatkan semangat dan dedikasi mereka dalam bekerja, sementara lingkungan kerja yang kondusif menciptakan suasana yang mendukung produktivitas dan kepuasan kerja. Dengan demikian, organisasi dapat meningkatkan kinerja pegawai dengan memperbaiki sistem insentif dan menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang lebih baik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".