MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Statin Therapy on Mortality and Rehospitalization in Acute Heart Failure Patients Stratified by Ejection Fraction: Insights from theGulf CARE Registry

2025· article· en· W4410094802 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Al‐Jarallah, Rajesh Rajan, Raja Dashti, Bassam Bulbanat, Mustafa Ridha, Kadhim Sulaiman, Ibrahim Al‐Zakwani, Alawi Alsheikh‐Ali, Prashanth Panduranga, Khalid F. AlHabib, Jassim Al Suwaidi, Wael Almahmeed, Hussam Al Faleh, Abdelfatah Elasfar, Ahmed Al‐Motarreb, Nooshin Bazargani, Nidal Asaad, Haitham Amin, Zhanna Kobalava, Peter A. Brady, Georgiana Luisa Baca, Parul Setiya, Ahmad Alsaber, Ghazaal Alavi Tabatabaei, Joud Al Balool, Keanu Razzaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Vascular Pharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureEjection fractionInternal medicineLogistic regressionStatinCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical outcomes of statin therapy in patients with acute heart failure [AHF] stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] in the Middle East are unknown. METHODS: We analysed 5005 patients admitted to 47 hospitals in seven Middle Eastern countries [Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Bahrain] with AHF from February to November 2012 with AHF who were enrolled in Gulf CARE, a multinational registry of patients with heart failure [HF]. AHF patients were stratified into three groups: HF patients with reduced [EF] [HFrEF] [<40%], HF with mildly reduced EF [HFmrEF] [40-49%], and HF patients with preserved EF [HFpEF] [≥50%]. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 59.3±14.9 years, 62.6% [n=3131.0] of the patients were males. A total of 2555 [51%] AHF patients had used statins prior to hospital admission. The mean EF was 36.9±14%. HFrEF was observed in 2683 patients [53%], whereas 961 patients [19.2%] had HFmrEF, and 932 patients [18.6%] had HFpEF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that prior statin use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality risk [OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.10-1.86, p=0.007] and hospitalization rates for heart failure [OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.83, p<0.001]. However, when examining rates of survival, there were no significant disparities between the two groups; at 3 months follow-up: aOR, 1.22; 95% Cl: 0.95-1.57; P=0.111; and 12-months follow-up: aOR, 1.07; 95% Cl: 1.07 0.87-1.31; P=0.553. Regarding rehospitalization rates, no significant difference was observed at a 3- month follow-up: aOR, 1.22; 95% Cl: 1.03-1.42; P=0.015. Interestingly, patients admitted with statin therapy were significantly associated with higher odds of hospitalization during the 12-month follow-up period: aOR, 1.42; 95% Cl: 1.21-1.66; P<0.001. CONCLUSION: Prior statin use was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality and rehospitalization. However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality between the two groups at both 3- and 12-month follow-ups. While rehospitalization rates at the 3-month follow-up showed higher odds of rehospitalization at the 12-month follow-up. Prior statin therapy appears to influence both in-hospital mortality and long-term rehospitalization outcomes in a Middle Eastern patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Vascular PharmacologySame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207