The Supply Chain Management Practices And The Operational Performance: Moderating Role Of Practice Of Users.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The competition between organizations now includes even the distribution carried out by firms for fair price. This research investigates the types and the variations between supply chain management (SCM) practice and operational performance. Hence this study was aimed at investigating the relationship between SCM practice and organizational performance. The research focused on industrial firms in Jordan. The research applied the theory parts, which are the affected 5 factors (components) that support cooperation between the factors to improve activities in SCM such as; customer relationship, postponed, operational performance, integration of technology, information sharing. Further, the research aims at classifying and identifying trends across these distinct studies. The research started by classifying the various variables of components which are: the matrix of supply chain integration, complexity management, aligning strategy, IT information and operational performance, in addition to customer relationships and supply collaboration. Data was collected from employees in industrial firms in Jordan. There were 327 respondents. A structural equation was utilized to obtain and analyze the data. Results of the study indicated that 5 factors have an effect on SCM practice. The results suggest that SCM practice, has a significance positive relation with the 5 factors from the sample. The research emphasized that the cooperation between these factors improve SCM. Also, it was argued in the research that SCM practice should be implemented as an integrated system with other factors, to improve the operational performance in these firms
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".