MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410100679 · doi:10.1002/jimd.70031

Consensus of Expert Opinion for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypermanganesaemia With Dystonia 1 and 2

2025· article· en· W4410100679 on OpenAlexaff
Sherry Fang, Peter T. Clayton, Divyani Garg, Sangeetha Yoganathan, Maha S. Zaki, Elin A. Helgadottir, Vala Palmadottir, Maude Landry, Sidney M. Gospe, Kshitij Mankad, Vincenzo Bonifati, Suvasini Sharma, Karin Tuschl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health NetworkMoncton Hospital
FundersMedical Research FoundationMedical Research CouncilStichting ParkinsonFonds
KeywordsDystoniaMedicinePathognomonicBasal gangliaParkinsonismNeurologyPathologyDiseaseInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypermanganesaemia with Dystonia 1 and 2 (HMNDYT1 and 2) are inherited, autosomal recessive disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the genes encoding the manganese transporters SLC30A10 and SLC39A14, respectively. Impaired hepatic and enterocytic manganese uptake (SLC39A14) and excretion (SLC30A10) lead to deposition of manganese in the basal ganglia resulting in childhood-onset dystonia-parkinsonism. HMNDYT1 is characterized by additional features due to manganese accumulation in the liver causing cirrhosis, polycythaemia, and depleted iron stores. High blood manganese levels and pathognomonic MRI brain appearances of manganese deposition resulting in T1 hyperintensity of the basal ganglia are diagnostic clues. Treatment is limited to chelation therapy and iron supplementation that can prevent disease progression. Due to their rarity, the awareness of the inherited manganese transporter defects is limited. Here, we provide consensus expert recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HMNDYT1 and 2 in order to facilitate early diagnosis and optimize clinical outcome. These recommendations were developed through an evidence and consensus-based process led by a group of 13 international experts across the disciplines of metabolic medicine, neurology, hematology, genetics, and radiology, and address the clinical presentation, diagnostic investigations, principles of treatment, and monitoring of patients with HMNDYT1 and 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.142
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.142
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0160.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inherited Metabolic DiseaseSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207