Sex-Specific Associations Between Body Mass Index and Knee Flexion Kinematics and Kinetics in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common surgical procedure after injury. However, ACLR contributes to aberrant biomechanical movement patterns that influence secondary injury or joint degeneration. Higher body size may influence gait and landing biomechanics differently between males and females. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of sex on the association between body mass index (BMI) and knee biomechanics long-term after ACLR recovery. DESIGN: Sixteen female (BMI: 27.7 [5.4]) and 14 male (BMI: 24.2 [5.5]) participants who had a history of ACLR performed walking and drop vertical jump tasks. METHODS: The knee-flexion angle (KFA), external knee flexion moment, knee abduction moment (landing), and knee adduction moment (gait) were measured using 3D motion capture. Body fat percentage was assessed using a BOD POD. Moderated regression evaluated the influence of sex on the association between BMI and biomechanical outcomes after adjusting for body fat percentage. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between sex and BMI on the KFA at heel contact (P = .01), peak KFA (P = .04), and peak external knee flexion moment (P = .05) during gait and on the KFA at ground contact during landing (P = .04). Higher BMI was associated with smaller KFAs at heel contact (P = .03), smaller peak KFAs during gait (P = .02), and smaller external knee flexion moments (P = .01) but only in females. Similarly, a higher BMI was associated with a smaller KFA at ground contact during landing (P = .03) but only in females. There was no sex by BMI interaction on the knee adduction moment during gait (P = .657) or on the knee abduction moment during landing (P = .643). Moreover, sex and BMI were not independent predictors of the knee adduction moment during gait or the knee abduction moment during landing (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The association between sex and BMI may have implications for posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis and ACL reinjury, and female sex and high BMI should be considered when designing individualized rehabilitation programs. These findings suggest that females with high BMI may benefit from interventions to improve knee flexion during landing and gait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".