MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410116516 · doi:10.2196/69333

Optimizing Clinical Decision Support System Functionality by Leveraging Specific Human-Computer Interaction Elements: Insights From a Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4410116516 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Azadi, Francisco José García‐Peñalvo

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Human Factors · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsabilityComputer scienceClinical decision support systemStandardizationAdaptabilityFlexibility (engineering)Decision support systemProcess managementKnowledge managementHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) play a pivotal role in health care by enhancing clinical decision-making processes. These systems represent a significant advancement in medical information systems. However, optimizing their effectiveness requires accounting for various human-computer interaction (HCI) elements that influence their functionality and user acceptance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and categorize key HCI elements that impact CDSS performance to enhance system usability, adaptability, and decision-making accuracy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review, identifying 923 studies from the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Papers were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. A rigorous quality assessment process was applied to ensure the relevance and reliability of the included studies. Ultimately, of the 923 papers identified, 43 (4.7%) that specifically addressed HCI elements applicable to CDSS environments were included in the final analysis. Data extraction and synthesis were performed to answer the research questions regarding HCI elements. RESULTS: A total of 12 distinct HCI elements were identified, each with the potential to influence CDSS functionality. These elements align with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 framework, which defines usability in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. "User satisfaction," "flexibility," and "individuality" enhance satisfaction by improving system adaptability and user acceptance. "Visibility," "explainability," and "user control" strengthen effectiveness by supporting decision-making and error prevention. "Ease of use" improves efficiency by streamlining interactions and reducing cognitive load. Some elements influence effectiveness and efficiency, such as "data entry," which ensures structured inputs for decision accuracy while optimizing workflows. Likewise, "alerts" provide timely information for effective decision-making and, simultaneously, are designed to avoid overwhelming users and maintain system efficiency. "Simplification" and "mental effort" also optimize workflows and reduce complexity. Furthermore, "interface" impacts effectiveness and efficiency by supporting accurate decision-making and streamlining user interaction. This categorization, aligned with ISO 9241-11, underscores the context and task dependency of usability, highlighting that HCI elements must be adapted to different user needs and environments for effective clinical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses a critical gap in CDSS research by offering a comprehensive framework of HCI elements tailored to the CDSS environment. Incorporating these elements into system design can improve user satisfaction, reduce data errors, and enhance the accuracy of medical decisions. The findings lay the groundwork for future research, offering practical guidelines for developing more reliable and efficient CDSS systems in medical informatics fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Human FactorsSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207