A highly conserved neuronal microexon in DAAM1 controls actin dynamics, RHOA/ROCK signaling, and memory formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Actin cytoskeleton dynamics is essential for proper nervous system development and function. A conserved set of neuronal-specific microexons influences multiple aspects of neurobiology; however, their roles in regulating the actin cytoskeleton are unknown. Here, we study a microexon in DAAM1, a formin-homology-2 (FH2) domain protein involved in actin reorganization. Microexon inclusion extends the linker region of the DAAM1 FH2 domain, altering actin polymerization. Genomic deletion of the microexon leads to neuritogenesis defects and increased calcium influx in differentiated neurons. Mice with this deletion exhibit postsynaptic defects, fewer immature dendritic spines, impaired long-term potentiation, and deficits in memory formation. These phenotypes are associated with increased RHOA/ROCK signaling, which regulates actin-cytoskeleton dynamics, and are partially rescued by treatment with a ROCK inhibitor. This study highlights the role of a conserved neuronal microexon in regulating actin dynamics and cognitive functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".