Corrigendum: Proceedings of the 12th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: cutting edge technology meets novel applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• please read through all the templates before choosing • pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated.In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. Name of all authors as they appear in the published original article: • Bahne H Bahners 20,21,22 • Vladimir Litvak 23 29,30,31 • Nicola G Cascella 32 • YoungHoon Nho 33 • Casey H Halpern 33,34 • Helen S Mayberg 35,36,37 PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3 38,39,40,41,42,43 • Evan M Gordon 44 • Jianxun Ren 45 • Hesheng Liu 45,46 • Lorraine V Kalia 47,48• Alfonso Enrique Martinez-Nunez 1 • Christopher J Rozell 2 • Simon Little 3 • Huiling Tan 4 • Stephen L Schmidt 5 • Warren M Grill 5,6 • Miroslav Pajic 5 • Dennis A Turner 5,6,7 • Coralie de Hemptinne 1 • Andre Machado• Luka Milosevic 24,25 • Saadi Ghatan 26,27 • Frederic L W V J Schaper 20 • Michael D Fox 20 • Nicholas M Gregg 28 • Cynthia Kubu 8 • James J Jordano• Ki Sueng Choi 35,36 • Haneul Song 35 • Jungho Cha 35 • Sankar Alagapan 2 • Nico U F Dosenbach• Dorian Kusyk 1 • Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora 1 • Kelly D Foote 1 • Michael S Okun 1 • Joshua K Wong 1 * Correspondence:Alfonso Enrique Martinez-Nunez, martineznuneza@ufl.edu Please also check that the initials used in the Author Contributions section or elsewhere in the article are correct.In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and author Sarah-Anna Hescham was erroneously excluded. The corrected author list appears below.• Alfonso Enrique Martinez-Nunez 1 • Christopher J Rozell 2 • Simon Little 3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.267 | 0.219 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".