Aquatic exercise versus standard care on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a disabling disease and a public health concern. Aquatic exercise is an alternative form of exercise with less spinal loading and difficulty performing movements, benefiting those with pain-related fear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an aquatic exercise program (SwimEx) versus standard care (SC) on lumbar paraspinal muscle volume and composition, strength and patient outcomes in individuals with chronic LBP. This randomized controlled trial included 34 participants with chronic LBP. Participants were randomly allocated to each group (SwimEx, n = 18; SC, n = 16) and underwent a 10-week supervised intervention program twice per week. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and 10-weeks to examine the impact of each intervention on multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) muscle volume (cm 3 ) and fatty infiltration (% FI) at L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Mixed model repeated measures ANCOVA revealed no significant time*group interactions for MF and ES volume and %FI. SwimEX had significant increases in MF volume at L2-L3 and L3-L4, and ES volume at L1-L2. Furthermore, SwimEX also had a significant increase in MF %FI at L2-L3. Both groups displayed significant increases in lumbar strength. Correlations between muscle morphology and patient outcomes showed improvements in MF volume were moderately correlated with an increase in physical quality of life and decrease in anxiety/depression. Interestingly, improvements in MF volume, MF %FI, and ES %FI, were each moderately correlated with a decrease in sleep disturbance. In conclusion, aquatic therapy may help increase lumbar paraspinal muscle volume and strength in participants with chronic LBP. Our findings support the notion that improvements in paraspinal muscle health are related to improvements in patient-reported outcomes. More imaging studies are required to examine the impact of exercise on overall paraspinal muscle health in chronic LBP and investigate these associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".