Direct-acting antivirals lower mortality and recurrence in HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma post liver resection: A multicenter international study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The impact of treatment on hepatitis C virus with direct-acting antivirals on 90-day postoperative outcomes, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival in patients after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Adults who underwent liver resection for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2000 and December 2018 were included from 7 international institutions. Groups included direct-acting antiviral treated, non-direct-acting antiviral treated, and untreated hepatitis C virus infection. We used a multivariable model to evaluate the association between receipt of preoperative direct-acting antivirals and 90-day postoperative major complications (Clavien-Dindo class ≥III). RESULTS: We identified 738 patients, including 206 (28%) direct-acting antiviral treated, 241 (33%) non-direct-acting antiviral treated, and 291 (39%) untreated patients. The sustained virologic response rate was 92% in the direct-acting antiviral and 71% in the non-direct-acting antiviral treatment groups. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (95% confidence interval 6.1, 8.6) after surgery for the entire cohort. Patients who received direct-acting antiviral therapy had better 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival than those without antiviral therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.19, 0.35] and 0.52 [0.43, 0.64], respectively). Patients who received direct-acting antiviral therapy had better 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival than those who received non-direct-acting antiviral therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.49 [0.36, 0.66] and 0.78 [0.63, 0.96], respectively). There was no significant association between preoperative direct-acting antiviral therapy and 90-day postoperative major complications (adjusted odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.08, 1.01). CONCLUSION: Direct-acting antiviral therapy is associated with improved 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival, without significantly increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications, in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".