Positive Impact of Holistic Nursing on Cognitive Impairment and Psychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) affects millions of elderly individuals worldwide and has been clinically recognized as one of the most significant disorders compromising quality of life in late-stage human development. The objective of this study is to systematically evaluate the influence of holistic nursing (HN) on patients with AD, thereby providing evidence-based references for clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 105 patients with AD hospitalized in our hospital between January 2023 and January 2024 were enrolled for prospective analysis. Among them, 58 received conventional care (control group), and 47 received HN (observation group). Before and following the nursing interventions, both groups underwent assessment using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Self-rating Anxiety/Depression Scales (SAS/SDS). In addition, neurotransmitter levels and neuroinflammatory markers were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay. Treatment compliance, incidence of adverse events, and family satisfaction were also recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After nursing interventions, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher MMSE and MoCA scores compared to the control group. Conversely, NPI, ADAS-cog, SAS, and SDS scores were notably lower in the observation group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, neurotransmitter levels were significantly elevated in the observation group, while the concentrations of central nervous system-specific protein β (S100β) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Although the incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05), the observation group exhibited higher treatment compliance and greater family satisfaction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: HN effectively improves cognitive function and alleviates psychiatric symptoms in AD patients, supporting its recommendation for clinical application. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. NCT06868004.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".