MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410140295 · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adn1441

A phase 1/2a clinical trial to assess safety and immunogenicity of an adenoviral-vectored capsular group B meningococcal vaccine

2025· article· en· W4410140295 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Dold, Blanché Oguti, Laura Silva-Reyes, Anna Stanzelova, Meriel Raymond, Catherine C. Smith, Maria Moore, A. Barton, E Choi, Emma Plested, Kiarash Tanha, Jennifer Louth, Ann Holland, Robert Cook, Jessica S. King, Jay Lucidarme, Ray Borrow, Adrian V. S. Hill, Peter T. Beernink, Xinxue Liu, Andrew J. Pollard, Christine S. Rollier

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Translational Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogenicityVaccinationAntigenAntibodyHeterologousVirologyMedicineBiologyImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capsular group B meningococcus (MenB) remains an important cause of disease globally, and additional vaccines against MenB would aid in reducing the incidence of infection. Previous work has demonstrated that a MenB adenoviral-vectored vaccine, ChAdOx1 MenB.1, elicited high serum bactericidal responses in preclinical models after a single dose, supporting further clinical development of this vaccine. Here, we report the results of a trial designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 in healthy adults aged 18 to 50. In this phase 1/2a, single-center trial, participants received one or two doses of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 at days 0 and 180. One dose of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 was also given at day 180 to some individuals primed with one dose of 4CMenB at day 0. Participants recorded their symptoms in an electronic diary after vaccination, and safety blood readouts were monitored. Serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays were performed against a panel of MenB target strains. ChAdOx1 MenB.1 was well tolerated with no safety concerns and elicited protective SBA titers against a MenB strain expressing a homologous factor H-binding protein (fHbp) variant in 100% of participants after two doses. However, cross-reactivity analysis indicated a low SBA response to strains expressing heterologous fHbp, suggesting that a multivalent vaccine may be needed. In sum, ChAdOx1 MenB.1 is immunogenic in humans, and addition of another fHbp variant or of another antigen in this platform could provide an approach to extend protection against endemic MenB disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Translational MedicineSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207