MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410141120 · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000200403

Identification of Distinct Biological Groups of Patients With Cryptogenic NORSE via Inflammatory Profiling

2025· article· en· W4410141120 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Guillemaud, Mario Chávez, Firas Kobeissy, Annamaria Vezzani, Anthony D. Jimenez, Maysaa Basha, Ayush Batra, Sophie Demeret, Onome Eka, Krista Eschbach, Brandon Foreman, Nicolas Gaspard, Elizabeth E. Gerard, Teneille Gofton, Hiba A. Haider, Stephen Hantus, Charles L. Howe, Amy C. Jongeling, Mariel Kalkach Aparicio, Padmaja Kandula, Karnig Kazazian, Minjee Kim, Yi‐Chen Lai, Clémence Marois, Andrew L. Mellor, Wazim Mohamed, M. Morales, Cederic M. Pimentel, Alexandra Martín Ramírez, Claude Steriade, Aaron F. Struck, Olga Taraschenko, Nathan Torcida, Mark S. Wainwright, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Kevin Wang, Vincent Navarro, Lawrence J. Hirsch, Aurélie Hanin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOtitis Media and Relapsing Polychondritis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Profiling (computer programming)Computational biologyBiologyMedicineComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify distinct inflammatory response subtypes in patients with c-NORSE by analyzing their cytokine profiles. Insights into underlying mechanisms were sought to understand the pathophysiology and guide personalized therapies to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with c-NORSE were included. A comprehensive panel of 96 cytokines was analyzed in serum samples. Patients were clustered based on their cytokine profiles using the Louvain algorithm, an unsupervised graph-based clustering method. The identified clusters of patients were compared regarding cytokine levels and clinical features. Protein pathway analysis was used to explore the biological relevance of the inflammatory markers within each cluster. Patients with c-NORSE were compared with control patients (n = 18) and patients with other forms of refractory SE (n = 45). RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with c-NORSE exhibited significant differences in 33 cytokines. Pathway analysis revealed dysregulations in chemotaxis and neutrophil recruitment and migration, highlighting the importance of innate immunity in patients with c-NORSE. Within the c-NORSE cohort, 3 clusters of patients emerged: cluster A, lacking specific inflammatory markers; cluster B, with a much stronger innate-immunity cytokine-driven inflammatory response compared with clusters A and C; and cluster C, defined by dysregulated autoimmune processes. Notably, patients in cluster B showed a statistically significant elevation of innate immune-related proinflammatory cytokines associated with leukocyte recruitment and degranulation. By contrast, those in cluster C showed activation of Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathways, suggesting autoimmune mechanisms. Patients in clusters B and C demonstrated varied responses to immunotherapies, with cluster C patients showing favorable outcomes after multiple immunotherapies. DISCUSSION: The identification of distinct inflammatory subgroups in c-NORSE suggests that variations in the underlying immune mechanisms contribute to differential treatment responses. These findings underscore the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies, potentially targeting specific inflammatory pathways, to optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology Neuroimmunology & NeuroinflammationSame topicOtitis Media and Relapsing PolychondritisFrench-language works237,207