MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410147088 · doi:10.1029/2024jb030831

The Heterogeneous Mantle Transition Zone Beneath the Tarim Craton and Adjacent Region: Insight Into the Thermal Processes by the Cenozoic Reactivation

2025· article· en· W4410147088 on OpenAlexaff
Yangfan Deng, Xiaofeng Liang, Zhou Zhang, Mijian Xu, Xiaohui Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCratonTransition zoneGeologyCenozoicMantle (geology)Tarim basinGeophysicsPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Tarim craton of central Asia, a stable continental block sandwiched between the Tianshan orogen and the Tibetan Plateau, has experienced significant tectonic reactivation due to the Cenozoic India‐Eurasia collision. Previous tomographic studies have identified lithospheric subduction along the Tibet‐Tarim and Tianshan‐Tarim boundaries. However, it is unclear what the fate of the subducted lithosphere is, and how much of it is subducted or detached into the mantle transition zone (MTZ). To investigate these issues, we use the recently deployed portable seismic array inside the Tarim Basin, along with stations in the surrounding regions, to estimate the structure of MTZ with receiver function analysis. Our key findings include: (a) An anomalously thickened MTZ beneath eastern Tarim, confirmed through systematic sedimentary and crustal correction tests to represent a detached cold lithospheric slab rather than near‐surface artifacts; (b) A locally thinned MTZ (∼6 km thinner than the global average) beneath central Tarim, possibly due to hot mantle upwelling potentially triggered by peripheral slab subduction; (c) Along the Tianshan orogen, MTZ thickness variations (thin in western vs. thick in central sections) resemble previous observations, while contrasting MTZ characteristics between Pamir (relatively thin) and Hindu Kush (thickened) regions suggest different slab penetration depths beneath these two regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207