MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, for Psoriasis of the Scalp and Body

2025· article· en· W4410156931 on OpenAlex
Melinda Gooderham, Javier Alonso‐Llamazares, Jerry Bagel, Neal Bhatia, Michael Bukhalo, Janet DuBois, Laura K. Ferris, Lawrence Green, Leon Kircik, Benjamin Lockshin, Wei Jing Loo, Kim Papp, Jennifer Soung, Melissa S. Seal, Scott Snyder, Saori Kato, David Krupa, Patrick Burnett, David R. Berk, David H. Chu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoProbity Medical ResearchWestern UniversitySKiN HealthQueen's University
FundersPfizerEli Lilly and CompanySun PharmaBristol-Myers SquibbAmgen
KeywordsMedicineScalpTolerabilityRandomized controlled trialPsoriasisClinical endpointRandomizationAdverse effectRoflumilastInternal medicinePhysical therapyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Current topical treatments for scalp psoriasis are limited by formulation, efficacy, and/or safety. Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in patients with psoriasis of the scalp and body. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 3 double-blinded, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted between August 24, 2021, and June 3, 2022, at 49 sites in Canada and the US. Eligible participants were 12 years and older with plaque psoriasis affecting up to 25% of the scalp and body, at least 10% of the scalp, and up to 20% of nonscalp areas, with a minimum Scalp-Investigator Global Assessment (S-IGA) score of 3 (moderate), and minimum Body-IGA (B-IGA) score of 2 (mild). Data analyses were performed from September 9 to December 30, 2022. Interventions: Once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3%, or vehicle for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were S-IGA and B-IGA success (clear [0] or almost clear [1] plus ≥2-grade improvement) at week 8. Secondary end points included S-IGA success at weeks 2 and 4, change in Scalp Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (SI-NRS), and SI-NRS and Worst Itch-NRS (WI-NRS) success (≥4-point improvement in patients with baseline score of ≥4). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: A total of 432 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [14.8] years; 243 women [56.3%]) were randomized to roflumilast foam (n = 281) or vehicle (n = 151). At week 8, 66.4% of the roflumilast group achieved S-IGA success vs 27.8% of the vehicle group (P < .001); and 45.5% of the roflumilast group achieved B-IGA success compared with 20.1% of the vehicle group (P < .001). Rates for S-IGA success at week 2 and SI-NRS and WI-NRS success at weeks 2, 4, and 8 were significantly higher for roflumilast vs vehicle. Improvements in SI-NRS were greater for the roflumilast vs the vehicle group as early as the first assessment (24 hours after the first application). Both study groups had low rates of adverse events and favorable tolerability profiles. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that roflumilast foam, 0.3%, improved signs and symptoms of psoriasis on the scalp and body, including pruritus, with low rates of adverse events in patients 12 years and older. These results demonstrate the potential of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, as monotherapy for patients with psoriasis of the scalp and body. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05028582.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it