MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410159208 · doi:10.14740/cr2049

Progression of Atherosclerosis and Hypothesis on the Relationship Between Microvascular Dysfunction, Cardiovascular Risk, and Cancer

2025· article· en· W4410159208 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ansgar Adams, Waldemar Bojara, Michel Romanens

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineCoronary atherosclerosisEndothelial dysfunctionCoronary heart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The extent of atherosclerosis in healthy men and women was measured using ultrasound in the carotid artery and whether the progression could be predicted using the classic risk factors was investigated. A hypothesis was also formulated as to how microvascular dysfunction and atherosclerosis, on the one hand, and cardiovascular disease and cancer, on the other hand, might be related. To describe the relationship between atherosclerosis and cancer, the classic risk factors and plaque burden were compared. Methods: From 2009 to 2024, 10,597 subjects (44% women) aged 20 - 65 years without signs of cardiovascular disease were examined using ultrasound of the carotid artery. The sum of all plaque areas (total plaque area (TPA)) and the maximum plaque thickness were measured. Follow-up examinations were carried out on 4,520 subjects (42% women) aged 40 - 65 years. In 2,397 men without cancer or cardiovascular events during follow-up, the classic risk factors and plaque burden were compared between 55 men who had a solid tumor and 188 men who had a cardiovascular event, and whether patients with cancer and a cardiovascular event exhibited different risk profiles was examined. Results: In the age group of 35 - 65 years, 12% of men and 4.2% of women had advanced atherosclerosis (types III and IVb). In the age group of 40 - 65 years, 2,592 men and 1,928 women were followed up. Low to moderate atherosclerosis was present in 2,052 (79.2%) men and 1,761 (91.3%) women. Advanced atherosclerosis developed in 139 (6.8%) men and 39 (2.2%) women, which could not be predicted by the classical risk factors (P > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 73 months (6.1 years) for men and 75 months (6.3 years) for women. Patients without cancer or cardiovascular disease have lower risk factors and lower plaque burden compared to men with cancer or cardiovascular events. Patients with cancer have very similar high-risk factors and high plaque burden compared to patients with cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: By measuring the plaque burden on the carotid artery, a good risk stratification can be achieved in every age group. A follow-up examination every 3 - 5 years is advisable, as a rapid progression of the disease cannot be predicted taking into account the classic risk factors. Early treatment of advanced atherosclerosis improves the prognosis for cardiovascular diseases and possibly also for certain types of cancer. Patients with cancer and cardiovascular events show a similar risk profile and plaque burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207