MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410159630 · doi:10.14740/cr1742

Difference Analysis of N-Terminal B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, High-Sensitivity Troponin I, and Endothelin-1 Levels in Patients With Normotensive and Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure

2025· article· en· W4410159630 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yose Ramda Ilhami, Eryati Darwin, Eva Decroli, Efrida Efrida

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Andalas
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineNatriuretic peptideHeart failureEndothelin 1Troponin TEndothelin receptorMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a condition commonly affecting elderly patients. Heart failure is classified based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) into hypertensive (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg), and normotensive (SBP < 140 mm Hg) categories. Differences in the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with each type of AHF may result in varying levels of biomarkers released by the heart during the episode, including N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity (hs)-troponin I, and endothelin-1. Currently, there are no studies comparing the levels of cardiac biomarkers between normotensive and hypertensive AHF. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the levels of NT-proBNP, hs-troponin I, and endothelin-1 in patients with hypertensive and normotensive AHF. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 104 patients with AHF (40 hypertensive, 64 normotensive) at M. Djamil General Hospital from August 2021 to November 2022. Clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and cardiac biomarker levels were assessed and compared between groups. Results: Patients with hypertensive AHF had significantly higher sodium and chloride levels with lower urea levels. Echocardiographic assessment showed higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (35.72% vs. 35.25%, P = 0.857), cardiac output (3.0 vs. 2.9 L/min, P = 0.669), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (2,276 vs. 2,200, P = 0.693), with lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (1.7 vs. 1.8 cm, P = 0.717), and estimated right atrial pressure (eRAP) > 8 (87.5% vs. 92.6%, P = 0.517) in normotensive AHF patients compared to hypertensive group, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The biomarkers test showed higher hs-troponin I levels (281 vs. 72.8 ng/L, P = 0.039) in normotensive AHF than those in hypertensive group. No significant differences were observed in endothelin-1 (12.12 vs. 12.02 pg/L, P = 0.510) and NT-proBNP levels (5,410 vs. 4,712 pg/mL, P = 0.122) between groups. Conclusions: In patients with normotensive AHF, higher levels of hs-troponin I were observed, with no significant differences in other cardiac biomarkers. A higher proportion of males and a lower prevalence of hypertension as a risk factor were also noted in normotensive AHF, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207