MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410160133 · doi:10.14740/cr2033

A Review on the Role of DNA Methylation in Aortic Disease Associated With Marfan Syndrome

2025· review· en· W4410160133 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
W Zhang, Chao Wu, Hao Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMarfan syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder primarily affecting the connective tissue, with cardiovascular complications as the leading cause of mortality. While mutations in the FBN1 gene are the primary cause, the severity and progression of the disease can vary significantly among individuals. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic regulatory mechanism, has garnered attention in MFS research, particularly regarding methylation changes in the FBN1 locus and their effects on fibrillin-1 expression. Differential methylation and expression of genes related to inflammation (e.g., interleukin (IL)-10, IL-17) and oxidative stress (e.g., PON2, TP53INP1) have been linked to MFS aortic pathology. These alterations likely contribute to disease progression by influencing inflammatory responses, smooth muscle cell apoptosis, and biomechanical properties of the aorta. The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway plays a central role in MFS pathology, with aberrant methylation of related genes potentially elevating active TGF-β levels and exacerbating aortic lesions. Notably, tissue-specific methylation patterns, especially in smooth muscle cells of the aorta, remain poorly understood. A deeper understanding of DNA methylation's role in MFS could pave the way for early interventions and epigenetic-targeted therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesFrench-language works237,207