Decision analysis with known and unknown weights in the complex N-cubic fuzzy environment: An application of accident prediction models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The component of Pakistan's road safety management (RSM) systems that appears to be the least reliable is the evaluation of road safety measures. Road safety initiatives' daily operations, such as allocating specific financial resources and incorporating measures for road safety into the fabric of culture, are only sometimes observed by governments. When this happens, the analysis usually concentrates on issues related to the infrastructure and the enforcement of laws; thorough evaluations of road safety initiatives are incredibly uncommon. Road authorities, practitioners, and architects of road safety depend on prediction tools, often known as accident prediction models (APMs). These instruments are employed to assess safety concerns, pinpoint areas for improvement, and calculate the expected safety consequences of these modifications. The goal of this research is to use the complex N-cubic fuzzy set (CNCFS), an innovative and practical tool for decision making that excels at handling imprecise or ambiguous data in real-world decision-making processes, in the context. This study also proposes a novel entropy approach to multi-attribute group decision-making issues in RSM. We also investigate the assessment of accident forecasting models in RSM to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the suggested strategy. Further, the advantages and superiority of the proposed strategy are explained using the experimental data and comparisons with known and unknown weights obtained by the entropy method. The study's conclusions demonstrate that the suggested approach is more workable and compatible with other current strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".