MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410186454 · doi:10.1080/14737175.2025.2500757

Pharmacological therapies for early and long-term recovery in disorders of consciousness: current knowledge and promising avenues

2025· review· en· W4410186454 on OpenAlexafffund
Rosalie Girard Pepin, Fatemeh Seyfzadehdarabad, David Williamson, Olivia Gosseries, Catherine Duclos

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKoning BoudewijnstichtingUniversité de MontréalFundação BialMind Science FoundationFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSFonds Léon FredericqCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsTerm (time)PsychologyNeurosciencePersistent vegetative stateMedicineCurrent (fluid)ConsciousnessPsychotherapistIntensive care medicineMinimally conscious statePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are characterized by impaired arousal and/or awareness, ranging from coma to unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and cognitive motor dissociation. Pharmacological treatment options remain limited, complicated by the heterogeneity of etiologies, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, and infections. The lack of rigorous clinical trials has led to off-label use of treatments, often without clear mechanistic understanding, posing challenges for effective patient care. AREAS COVERED: In this perspective, the authors report on key studies concerning the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions, including dopaminergic and GABAergic agents, antidepressants, statins, and anticonvulsants, in promoting recovery of consciousness in DoC. EXPERT OPINION: Robust longitudinal clinical trials are needed, with priority given to early subacute phase intervention. Outcomes should be better defined, considering immediate responses to medication while also increasing the emphasis on long-term quality of life. Unified functional and mechanistic frameworks are needed to guide research and foster collaboration. Furthermore, a shift toward personalized medicine would benefit this heterogeneous population. Moving forward, assessing the efficacy of more unconventional or 'paradoxical' pharmacological options in treatment plans will be essential. The authors also expect an increased use of AI tools to identify factors that best predict treatment responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of NeurotherapeuticsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207