MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410191686 · doi:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf047

A deep learning phenome wide association study of the electrocardiogram

2025· article· en· W4410191686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaNorges IdrettshøgskoleJohnson and JohnsonBoston Scientific CorporationNational Institutes of HealthApple
KeywordsPhenomeAssociation (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMedicinePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Deep learning methods have shown impressive performance in detecting a range of diseases from electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms, but the breadth of diseases that can be detected with high accuracy remains unknown, and in many cases the changes to the ECG allowing these classifications are also opaque. In this study, we aim to determine the full set of cardiac and non-cardiac conditions detectable from the ECG and to understand which ECG features contribute to the disease classification. Methods and results: Using large datasets of ECGs and connected electronic health records from two separate medical centres, we independently trained PheWASNet, a multi-task deep learning model, to detect 1243 different disease phenotypes from the raw ECG waveform. We confirmed that the ECG can be used to detect chronic kidney disease (AUC = 0.80), cirrhosis (AUC = 0.80), and sepsis (AUC = 0.84), as well as a range of cardiac diseases, and also found new detectable conditions, including respiratory failure (AUC = 0.86), neutropenia (AUC = 0.83), and menstrual disorders (AUC = 0.84). We found that of the 37 non-cardiac strongly detectable conditions, 35 were detectable by the model output for just four diseases, suggesting that they have similar effects on the ECG. We found that high performance in some conditions including neutropenia, respiratory failure, and sepsis can be explained by linear models based on conventional measurements taken from the ECG. Conclusion: Our study uncovers a range of diseases detectable in the ECG, including many previously unknown phenotypes, and makes progress towards understanding ECG features that allow this detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it